Arctic, arctic sovereignty, Denmark, Donald Trump, Greenland, Mining Exploration, United States

Opinion: Hey, Greenland! Join us, not the United States

Just next door, your island would be a good fit with the administrative structure and cultural makeup of our three northern territories

By Erin Weir

Donald Trump has suggested he might like to take over Canada and Greenland. While we’re re-imagining the geography of the Western Hemisphere, why not consider the advantages, both for it and for us, of Greenland joining Canada?

Canada and Greenland are Arctic neighbours, and in fact already share a small land border on Hans Island — which would be even less in dispute if it became a territorial boundary. We also share significant cultural connections. Greenland’s population is overwhelmingly Inuit, while Canada is home to the world’s largest Inuit population. Both Inuit populations are several times larger than Alaska’s or, for that matter, Denmark’s.

Financial Post
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or
View more offers
If you are a Home delivery print subscriber, online access is included in your subscription. Activate your Online Access Now

Greenland aims to develop its economy through mining. The United States is an economic superpower, of course, but in mining Canadian companies are the world leaders and, for obvious reasons, have extensive experience building and operating Arctic mines.

Though Greenland’s prime minister wants his country to be independent, it relies on Denmark for fiscal support. The Americans could afford such support, but just how Greenland might fit into the U.S. is far from clear. Would it get statehood? That seems unlikely, given its population of just below 60,000, barely a tenth that of Wyoming, currently the least populous state. The U.S. territories without statehood are the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and a handful of small tropical islands. Neither governance model seems likely to appeal to Greenlanders.

By contrast, Canada has political institutions that meet the unique needs of large Arctic territories. For decades, our federal government has devolved greater authority to territorial governments and provided Territorial Formula Financing (TTF) to cover the costs of delivering essential public services in remote northern areas.

Top Stories
Top Stories

Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Since 1982, Canada’s constitution has specifically recognized Inuit aboriginal rights. In 1999, Nunavut was established to provide an Inuit homeland. At two million square kilometres, Greenland is almost exactly the same size as Nunavut. Greenland’s population is larger than any single Canadian territory’s but smaller than any two combined. Greenland could easily fit into Confederation as a fourth territory.

Territorial funding currently costs $5 billion a year — less than one per cent of the federal budget. Denmark provides Greenland with an annual block grant of just under the equivalent of $1 billion. Incorporating Greenland into TFF almost certainly would provide more support than Denmark’s block grant currently does but with minimal impact on Canada’s federal budget.

In addition to having a population and economy six times larger than Denmark’s, Canada is much closer to Greenland than Denmark is. Denmark must maintain completely separate infrastructure for Greenland and the U.S. would have the same problem. But existing ports, airfields and other facilities in Newfoundland & Labrador and Nunavut could help to serve Greenland and vice versa.

Right now, the competitive division of fishing, resource and shipping rights in Baffin Bay and the Labrador Sea between Canada and Greenland is an obstacle to both economic development and environmental protection. Unifying Canada and Greenland would allow a more coherent approach to sustainable development in the Arctic.

Trump argues that the U.S. needs Greenland for aerospace security. But Canada and the U.S. jointly comprise the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD). Greenland joining Confederation would fully integrate it into the NORAD defences, which stretch across Canada’s existing Arctic territories.

Confederation arose when Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia banded together in the face of tariffs and other threats from the U.S. The most recent addition was Newfoundland and Labrador, which joined in 1949 to fully access Canada’s nearby economy, infrastructure and public services. In the face of renewed threats from south of the border, we should extend the same opportunity to Greenland.

Erin Weir, a consulting economist, was an MP from 2015 to 2019.

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters financialpost.com.