Amazon.com Inc. chief executive Andy Jassy suddenly has a lot of unhappy employees on his hands after his recent return-to-office push.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

Return-to-office fight not over yet as workers say flexibility is a right, not a perk Back to video

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.

Play Video

The tech giant’s CEO previously endorsed a “no one-size-fits-all approach” to where employees work, but he’s now ordered corporate staff back to the office for a minimum of three days a week starting May 1. “Teams tend to be better connected to one another when they see each other in person more frequently,” Jassy said in the announcement. “There is something about being face to face with somebody, looking them in the eye and seeing they’re fully immersed in whatever you’re discussing that bonds people together.”

Unsurprisingly, workers were quick to push back. Within hours of the announcement, a new Remote Advocacy channel on Slack, filled with outraged Amazon employees, popped up. Staffers also started circulating a petition demanding management drop the back-to-office order. As of last Tuesday, 5,000 workers had signed the petition and 16,000 had joined the Slack group, CNBC reported.

Some said being forced to return to the office is so unpalatable that they’ll quit. Almost 80 per cent of Amazon employees who responded to a poll on the Slack channel said they’ll look for new opportunities outside the company if the mandate goes ahead, according to Business Insider.

Jassy might not think that’s a bad thing amid a cost-cutting campaign expected to result in 18,000 layoffs at Amazon this year. But the swift backlash illustrates how workers won’t easily give up what they now consider a mandatory condition of doing their jobs, even if sector-wide layoffs are on the table.

That sentiment is also playing out in Canada, where 81 per cent of workers say being able to work from home is a factor in determining whether they stay at a job or not, according to the latest Cisco Systems Inc. hybrid-work survey. Workers like the gains they’ve experienced in work-life balance, with 79 per cent saying flexibility has been a positive, and 47 per cent saying it’s been “very” positive — up 16 per cent from last year’s survey. And 23 per cent say flexibility about work location is their top priority when seeking out a new job, second only to higher pay.

Nevertheless, employers still seem eager to get everyone back into the office. Of the managers surveyed, 61 per cent have or plan to set a mandatory number of in-office days in the coming months, and 54 per cent plan to ask workers to come in more often, if they haven’t already. Those findings highlight a clear gap between employer and employee expectations about working from home, Cisco said.

“At the highest level, there’s satisfaction overall with hybrid work amongst both employees and employers,” Shannon Leininger, president of Cisco Canada, told The Canadian Press. “But when we dig into the numbers, there’s a tension between the expectations of employees and employers. Employers feel like hybrid work is a benefit. Employees feel like it’s expected.”

Of course, working from home also has its drawbacks. Studies show employees worry they’ll miss out on career advancement opportunities if they don’t put in enough face time at the office, and those who work on a fully remote basis often complain of loneliness and isolation. One recent report on remote work by the Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU) in partnership with the Future Skills Centre found that 43 per cent of people who work from home every day say their connection with colleagues has worsened.

“I don’t think remote work is going away, but we have to get a whole lot better at it,” said Paula Allen, global leader and senior vice-president, Research and Total Well-Being, at Lifeworks Inc., a unit of Telus Corp.’s health division. “People are just not feeling as connected to the workplace and not feeling as connected to their co-workers.”

Addressing those feelings of isolation is one good reason to get people back into the office, and Amazon’s Jassy highlights connection as the motivation behind his push for more on-site days. But forcing staff back three days a week — as Jassy, Apple Inc.’s Tim Cook and other executives have mandated — might be too much. The perfect amount of in-office time could be just one day a week, according to an analysis of TMU’s report on The Conversation.

Employees who come into the office one day a week report higher levels of job satisfaction, productivity and trust in their employers than those who come in two or more days. The authors of the analysis point out that 84 per cent of remote workers say they are highly satisfied with their jobs, as are 83 per cent of people who work one day a week in the office, but that drops to 70 per cent for people forced to work two or more days a week in the office.

“Working one day a week in person might be a sweet spot for maintaining job satisfaction and performance, while still providing opportunities for building in-person connections,” the authors said.

Employers itching to get staff back into the office might want to consider the one-day-a-week plan. After all, unhappy employees are less engaged and less productive, and could end up using their work hours to research their exits, which might end up hitting corporate balance sheets in a negative way. Perhaps that’s something Jassy is about to find out.

• Email: vwells@postmedia.com | Twitter: vwells80

This story was first published in the FP Work newsletter, a curated look at the changing world of work. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Tuesday.